Briefly while I take a short break during Lost.
I think that there are some ways that the New York Post article could be misunderstood if the artist's intention was not to be construed as a racial image. I guess they are trying to associate it with some of the primate issues that were going on this past week.
However, there is SO much history behind the connotation of an ape-like creature and African Americans.
Did they not have editors who looked at the image and had second thoughts about it? Did they not have someone who looked at the image and said, maybe this might be a bit offensive?
I don't know.
It all seems kind of fishy to me.
Back to confusing myself with Lost.